This report is part of a series of reports issued by the EPOC Working Group on aspects of "Enabling the Provision of Open Courseware". For the benefit of readers without access to the other reports this report includes several extracts from the first EPOC report. The primary aim of this report is to provide further discussion of some of the more technical issues which in the first report were merely summarised.
Reports Summary to Date:
EPOC Report No. 1 "Report of the TLTP Working Group on Open Courseware" establishes a context, provides an overview of the main issues, and introduces a framework for subsequent reports which can focus in more depth on various specialised aspects.
EPOC Report No.1. includes:
EPOC Report No.2. "Pre-requisites for Open Courseware" is intended to provide advice and guidelines on some very fundamental technical issues, e.g., what is required just to successfully install and operate different courseware products on the same machine; what should developers do now to anticipate migration towards open courseware? Report No.2 will rely upon contributions from various sources and is likely to remain in the form of an evolving web-based document rather than be delivered in printed form.
Report No. 2 is is intended to be a WWW document only, so that it may continually evolve as information is incorporated on new products, and from disparate sources across the globe.
All EPOC reports will be located on the world wide web, accessible from the EPOC home page. This site will be continually updated with references to related work; hence relevant links to the work of other courseware practitioners are always welcome. Most of EPOC's work will exploit web publishing as the most practical way of providing an evolving source of information. From time to time, some of the reports will be delivered in printed form.
(An edited extract from Report No.1. "Report of the TLTP Working Group on Open Courseware".)
The courseware development community in UK higher education has now developed significant volumes of computer based courseware across a diverse range of subject disciplines. The major escalation of courseware development during the last few years is partly attributable to the Teaching and Learning Technology Programme (TLTP). The widely held aspiration is that the freely available courseware emerging from the TLTP will become widely implemented within higher education institutions and that new and innovative ways of delivering higher education will be enabled by these courseware resources.
However, there are serious inhibitors, both cultural and technical, which could impair the widespread exploitation of existing and future courseware. It is outside the scope of these reports to speculate on cultural inhibitors and their remedies. These reports are therefore deliberately restricted in scope to a range of technical issues which affect the exploitability of courseware resources.
The shared beliefs and concerns which the EPOC Working Group has identified can be briefly summarised as follows:
The beliefs are that for courseware to be widely exploited within universities:
The concerns are:
The EPOC Working Group (hereafter referred to as EPOC) believes that ultimately courseware will need to be "open courseware" before the diversities can be successfully accommodated, the necessary integration can be achieved, and the technical incompatibilities eliminated. EPOC believes that "standards for open courseware" are an inevitable and essential requirement for the courseware community. EPOC also believes that these standards need to emerge out of, and hence be compatible with, the existing courseware developments, rather than be specified remotely and imposed upon the courseware community. To this end, EPOC is trying to promote a collaborative approach to providing solutions which can be placed in the public domain.
The road to achieving "open courseware" is however fraught with difficulties. An immediate, overnight fix for all existing courseware is quite simply not available. Hence, EPOC has been concerned with establishing short-term partial solutions, which can ease some of the immediate difficulties, and with longer-term solutions which can make strides towards genuinely open courseware.